Two unions that have been battling for the right to represent the Clark County School District's support staff have agreed to divide the employees into two groups, ending a bitter labor dispute that spanned nearly two decades.  

Under the agreement announced Thursday, the Education Support Employees Association (ESEA), which is currently the recognized bargaining agent for the entire support staff, will continues to represent roughly 8,000 "Unit 1" employees in the administrative, business, food service, information systems and aide positions. 

Teamsters Local 14, meanwhile, will represent 4,158 "Unit2 employees in transportation, broadcast/communications, police services, operations and skilled trades. 

Both sides heralded the compromise as one that will bring stability and put to rest a war that cost both sides a lot of money. 

"We can have a relationship" 

"Hopefully moving forward, we can have a relationship...that suits both sides," said Larry Griffith, Secretary Treasurer of Teamsters Local 14. "So it's a win-win for everybody here. It's a good thing." 

ESEA officials also looked forward to moving on from the long struggle. 

"Labor peace will bring more stability to those classrooms, to those bus yards, to the food service workers, to all the important (education support professionals) which are the backbone of the Clark County school system," said Brian Lee, acting Executive Director of the ESEA.  

Both union leaders agreed there are some employees who would be unhappy with the agreement.  

"There are a lot of bitter people that are going to be bitter, but we just have to sit down, explain to the what happened, why we did it, and hopefully it brings stability to that entire group which they didn't have before," Griffith said.  

The truce appears to end a battle that dates to around 2000 over representation of an employee group that has grown to more than 12,000 members. 

The ESEA has struggled to keep its membership numbers up. District data from June 2018 shows that only 4,193 support staff had union dues deducted from their paycheck, suggesting low membership levels.  

Meanwhile, the Teamsters had been battling to be the recognized bargaining agent for the support staff.  

Finally friends. 

The battle played out in court cases, multiple elections and before the Government Employee-Management Relations Board before the agreement to divide the workers was reached.  

Three elections in 2006 and 2015 showed that the Teamsters had the support of a majority of support staff who voted.  

But the Nevada Supreme Court last year ruled that a union must win the votes of the majority of all members in a bargaining union- not just a majority of those voting- to be recognized as the new bargaining agent.  

The new accord has a "no-raid" clause in which each party promises that it will not try to poach members or help others try to persuade employees to switch to another bargaining group.  

"In addition to the no-raid agreement, the parties agree that should either party become the target of a raid by another union...the parties will cooperate and collaborate to defend against such a raid," the agreement said. 

Under the deal, the ESEA still will deduct union dues from the Unit 2 employees that are represented by the Teamsters, but then transmit that money to Teamsters. 

And the ESEA will appoint Unit 2 employees to the union's bargaining team and transfer certain existing employment grievances from Unit 2 employees to the union's bargaining team and transfer certain existing employment grievances from Unit 2 employees to the Teamsters for representation. Lee estimated there are under 50 pending grievances from Unit 2 employees. 

The Teamsters must provide "sufficient personnel" to provide support for investigatory interviews, grievances and other representation needs for Unit 2 employees.  

Once both parties have a membership level that is 51 percent of the total number of employees in each unit, the ESEA will ask the district to split support staff into two recognized bargaining agents. State law requires employee organizations to prove that they represent a majority of the employees in the bargaining unit to become the official bargaining agent. 

"If necessary, ESEA will assist and support Local 14 in its efforts to obtain recognition from CCSD," the agreement said. 

While the Teamsters expect to reach the majority threshold by Christmas, ESEA noted it may take a bit longer. If the Teamsters get there first, Le said both parties will sit down to discuss whether to move ahead with formally splitting the union. 

Click here for full article


Reno, Carson City and Las Vegas metro areas continued to show impressive job growth in August and over the year, according to the Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation’s August 2019 economic sub-state report...All three MSAs had faster employment growth rates than the national rate of 1.4 percent, and showed growth over the year, the report states.

Read full story here 


The Nevada Commission on Tourism has determined that a planned art and retail project south of Palace Station would draw more than half of its visitors from out of town and qualifies as a tourism improvement district... As a qualified district, 3.13 percent of tax revenue would be diverted directly to the development of the area — an estimated $688,000 annually for the 10 years the district would be in place.

Read full story here 


"Jobs are precarious, health-care costs are skyrocketing, and wages aren’t keeping up with the cost of living—no wonder young people are organizing... Maybe it’s time to take inspiration from the latest stats about millennials: Workers age 35 and under are the main component of an unprecedented surge in union membership over the past two years." 


As an American business owner, I believe that labor unions are important but unnecessary if employees are treated fairly. In a perfect world, there would be no need for labor unions; unfortunately, we don’t live in that world. Because of this, I believe that unions will never be completely eradicated, no matter how many businesses, politicians or workers oppose them. With that being said, I think that their best chance of seeing growth in the near future is to continue building their current political momentum and pushing for limits on corporate power.

Read the full story here